EtternaOnline Keyboard Pack 1 (Submissions Open)


(tentative name) - Banner by GreenDeLeBean - Thank you my goat

This is a new pack project that’s replacing the old EOPack. This pack aims to collect fun conventional simfiles created by users of the community. Quality standards here will be quite lax as a result, so come on and join the fun!

Pack Rules

  1. Your files have to make sense in some way. Do not send me mindless gorilla smash chordjacks or charts that don’t follow the music.

  2. Your files also have to be playable. Do not send me stuff that’s excessively difficult, unbalanced, spiky, or contain a segment that the primary difficulty is from that part.

  3. Most importantly, your files have to be genuine. Do not send me low-effort, mediocre files that you made just for the hell of it. Send something that you are truly proud of making.

  4. No dump/abstract charts. As mentioned before, this pack is focused on conventional/technically accurate simfiles. However, there are certain dump elements that may be allowed depending on the context of the song. In that case, shoot your shot.

  5. No modcharts. This will be for a different special pack project! X-Mod/scroll gimmick charts are acceptable.

  6. Max difficulty of charts should not go above 28 MSD. Avoid submitting charts that are above these difficulties unless you are really confident that they’re good.

  7. No meme files (Unless they’re actually funny, I am the deciding factor on that… unlucky)

  8. It is highly recommended to include graphics with your files. If you can’t include ones, or the quality is too low, graphics will be provided for you… the quality of which may be questionable :slight_smile:

  9. Max 3 files per individual. You can submit as many song charts as you want, but in order to diversify the charter rooster, only up to 3 of your best submissions will end up in the pack.

  10. SM/SSC files only. No osu!, Quaver, or files from other rhythm games.

  11. Submissions will be open until May 1st.

  12. You cannot participate if you are currently banned from any part of EO. (Site / Forum / Discord)

These rules may seem a bit intimidating at first, but honestly, if you just send something that you find decent, then you have nothing to worry about.

Files passing the requirements above will be determined by me. After that, the way the pack will ultimately come together is up to you. So send over only your best files that you will be proud of showing to the community!

Submission Process

If you meet the above rules, then you are more than welcome to submit using this form link! Once your submission has been successfully entered, it will automatically appear in the main pack spreadsheet, where it will be awaiting review.

Review Process

Reviews will be posted in sets, with each set including up to 5 submissions. If you are in the server and include your Discord username in the submission form, you will be given a role for that set that will be pinged once it has been fully reviewed. If a set has fewer than five submissions after some time, I will review it early and new submissions will be placed in the next set.

Because of the potentially large number of submissions I’m gonna get, please don’t expect detailed feedback on your chart. I will mainly review submissions on a Yes/No basis with little to none to say about a chart. This helps me looking at submissions faster and organize other things in the pack much quicker. In many cases, a charter does not need that feedback if they know what they were going for. For more novice charters, if you have a chart that’s been rejected, I can try my best to explain why if requested, but it is not a guarantee.

There are four statuses used for submissions: Passed, Conditional, Rejected, and Complete.

Passed means the submission is acceptable and is currently included in the pack. These submissions are then shared with the pack participants. The participants can be judges, playtesters, or anyone else involved in the pack’s development (which is you!). Their feedback and evaluation will carry weight in my final decision of keeping these files or not in the pack once it’s finalized.

Conditional is used for submissions that have issues but have the potential to pass once fixed. It can be for any reason that I deem important to address such as layering mistakes, unclear patterning/approach, bad song audio/metadata, etc. If the revisions are not satisfactory to me, then the submission can also end up in Rejected.

Rejected means the submission unfortunately did not pass the requirements for what I am looking to include in the pack. Usually, rejected submissions cannot be resubmitted again unless the file has undergone a significant overhaul. The Rejected status may also apply to files that initially passed but were ultimately not included in the final pack’s song list.

Complete means that the submission is finalized and is ready to be locked into the pack. This is the final step to fully accepting the file into the pack!

Contribution

Beyond just submitting files, you’re welcome to contribute to the pack in other ways as well. You can help by playtesting and providing feedback on approved charts, create GFX sets to charts that you like, make CDtitles, and other things that support the community effort needed to complete the pack faster and together.

More formally, I’m looking for playtesters, graphic designers, and anyone else who would like to contribute their skills to help me finish the pack more efficiently. If you’re interested in becoming an official contributor, feel free to contact me.

4 Likes

paq’ing your thread nerd

future paq

packuuu

Got already many charts submitted, and now it’s time to review them!

Set 1, 2, 3 reviews:

Passed Charts:
Momentary Life (Windoze)

Neolights (Windoze)

thank you my darling (EtienneXD) - Very cute floaty bpm chill chart. I’d recommend looking over the quad usage again because it seems a bit random to me, and also maybe revisit 01:20.074-01:31.479 to tighten the PR on the piano notes. I see that you kinda accentuated one specific tone consistently as [24] jump notes but eventually gave up on that mid-way.

QUANTUMFLUX (nonyu)

Green Coffee Beans Store - Emamouse [reroguro] - I will admit I was a bit concerned about the song choice being too boring, but the chart makes up for it quite well. Good stuff.

乳糜湯気 [reroguro]

Feelgood Koshimizu [reroguro]

LADY MADONNA(17 YEARS OLD) [reroguro]

For future submissions, please include your step artist name in the folder’s name. Also, do you need a cdtitle? It seems like you’re using a placeholder judging by the random Lain image.

Daisycutter [SigWifeStarry] - This is cool. My big concern personally is that 0:46-0:55 is very undercharted, I think you could layer another thing into it, like the drums. Does you think that’s a good idea?

Strange Oriental Discourse (James May)

Conditional:
Nour (Cut Ver.) [Sakisagee] - This one I’m a bit iffy about, particularly because of the excessive use of minijacks in the chart. Majority of them don’t make sense to me and I think you’re forcing them into the song too much. The chart itself plays so exceptionally well though. Look into making a secondary diff that eliminates most of the minijacks and then this can pass in my opinion.

Tetoris (James May) - For some reason when you start the chart there’s a 0 text box appearing at the top left, which needs to be either removed or renamed to indicate it’s a forced x-mod file. Also I think you should slightly clean up the second verse where you try to layer the scratch noises, it’s a bit loosely charted and thus difficult to understand. Conditional for both points, once these are sorted it can pass.

Rejected:
Charismax [SigWIfeStarry] - I love you for charting this song. And honestly, the way this is charted is silly which makes me like it even more. However, the chart suffers from several issues:

  1. You’ve cut the song WAY too short and it feels like you’ve only kept 30% of it. You can definitely chart more and make a longer, cut version of the song in case you don’t want to chart the entire thing.
  2. There’s a huge disparity in difficulty balance between the first half and the second half. The second half is way more harder.
  3. On top of that, the second half in itself doesn’t make too much sense if I gauge it from a complete technical standpoint (the patterns are a bit too dense for the song). But, I don’t mind keeping it as an extra Beginner difficulty if you decide to make easier difficulties that follow the song more faithfully. But just this difficulty alone doesn’t really cut it in my opinion.

Overall, this can be resubmitted if you chart more of the song, and make extra difficulties that follow the song more faithfully, in a less dense approach than your original submission.

U & I (SoldierLovesTacos) - Sadly this chart is beyond the scope of this pack. The chart is more dump oriented than it is technically oriented. It looks good as a scoring jumpstream file though, and I might have a different place this can go to in-case you can’t find a different pack to submit to.

untitled_2 (MrFoap) - This is a full-on dump chart. This pack is focused on technically accurate / conventional simfiles and not dumps. I encourage you to read the pack rules again and submit something more appropriate.

yknow what sure, why not, I’m behind on quota since I missed last secret santa (joke)

Set 4, 5, 6 reviews:

Passed Charts:
caramel ribbon cursetard [tony]
You WIll Know Our Names (DE) [tony]
These are very nice and I’m sure novice players will enjoy trying these ones out. There’s definitely potential to improve the charts by making the patterning more consistent, since your jumps and hands are a bit arbitrarily placed. But the overall approach makes sense. I hope there are a few judges and playtesters that can give feedback where it’ll iron out them out better.

evanescencebringmetoliferemix [IssacAtkins]
(focusing on the hardest diff) Possibly the most easiest file I have in the pack so far. The approach makes sense and I’m positive this will be a doozy for beginner players.

For future submissions, both of you please include your stepartist name in the folder name.

New Jeans Jersey Remix (Part 2) [DMRIw]
I got some feedback on it and the conclusion was that it’s fun. And the chart overall makes sense, so why not?

katyperrylastfridaynight [isaacatkins]
swingrowersnostringsattached [isaacatkins]

Republic of Rough and Ready (Jade5) - Really fucking awesome chart. This is my favorite submission so far. If I had a Rainbow Pass role this would’ve got it.

Swift [jh05013]

Citadel [Axel Sky]

Nyan Cat [Tielesiti] - Well, it’s nyan cat, and it’s repetitive, but it’s properly repetitive so it’s good to pass.

For future submissions, both of you (Axel & Tiel) please include your stepartist name in the folder name.

Yuuki_Ga_Kimi_Wo_Matteiru [SigWifeStarry] - Overall makes sense. Some of the 16ths are a little more freeform than they should be imo, but I think I will be fine with this one.

Conditional:

Vitrum (NzArs) - This was a hard one to decide. The overall approach makes sense, but there are a few dumpy elements that stretch the boundaries of what I would consider fitting for the pack (for example, the 32nd bursts at the beginning). I think you could clean up those dumpy patterns while still retaining the same feeling you were going for with this chart. You could keep this difficulty as a bonus once you make a secondary version that removes the dumped patterns included in the chart.

Fast Asleep (spnch) - This was an even harder one to decide. I get what you’re going for, the overall structure makes sense, almost too much sense if you get what I mean. Because of all the sounds you’re trying to represent the chart ends up being too cluttered and blurry to understand. The only thing I would say that straight up doesn’t make sense to me is the 48th stream representation for the guitar sound at the intro. You said you’ll be working on it more so i’m putting it under the same status until the 3rd submission comes in.

IM THE GOD OF BASS [savimybeloved] - I’m kind of surprised… This chart isn’t as terrible as I thought it would be. The general approach makes sense, and there are some small inconsistencies that could be fixed with proper feedback. However, the second half becomes too difficult with all the 16th jump/hand glut variations, which need to be nerfed. Some of them are also mistimed and should be 12ths instead of 16ths. Please revise the second half to remove those 16th jump/hand gluts, and then we can proceed from there. Because I’m not sure how other people feel about this chart, it’s also placed under Conditional for community feedback. So overall, Conditional status for fixing second half, and community feedback.

Rejected:
Laid Back Journey [tony]
Sadly I am more lost on this one in terms of the consistency/patterning, it requires a lot more work to be passable. The audio quality is also bad (volume too low). I also don’t think this would survive the final cut of the pack, so I’m rejecting this in advance.

Dominus Abyssi Phase I [Axel Sky] - First of all, your music is amazing. Who are you? Surely you’ve had some more music background before using this name, because I couldn’t find any information about you other than your YouTube channel and SoundCloud. Honestly, I didn’t expect to receive original music for the pack, but you’ve completely blown me away with these songs. Unfortunately, despite the music slapping, this chart is extremely underwhelming. In itself, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a bad thing, but the patterns are 90% of the time copy pasted with zero variation which makes the song feel stagnant. This was not as noticeable to me on Citadel which is why that one passed (but still, you should add some more variation to your patterns imo), but here it’s very obvious and starts to get tiring after a while. That said, the music is still very nice, and thanks for showing it here.

Set 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 reviews:

Passed Charts:
Fast Asleep (spnch)

Cynthia (nifSM and nonyu)

Tetoris (James May)

Five magics (Tortualex)

Dummy! (bluevie)

Flim (bluevie)

caramel ribbon cursetard [tony] - 2nd resub

You WIll Know Our Names (DE) [tony] - 2nd resub, added as a secondary difficulty to your original submission, since the changes are a bit drastic to the original, but still okay to be in a second diff.

Sleepless Night of the Eastern Country (James May)

DIVE BEAM (remory) - This is your first ever chart? You pretty much nailed it. You do have a few mistimed note here and there so I encourage you to go back and try to see if you spot them. Otherwise this is a nice easy chart.

Angel of Shit [Val]

Doppelganger [Val]

Get my way! (m1s) - I can’t read that intro holds but it doesn’t seem bad in itself. Also lifts in my chart what the hell? But yeah the overall file makes sense so it passes. Also moved the hardest difficulty to Beginner to reflect the more accurate chart. The hardest diff one is a little more freeform than the rest, but it still makes sense. But to give more attention to the second hardest one, I think moving it to Beginner is a good idea.

Everyday [val]

Mi Gente [val]

Vitrum (NzArs)

Rude buster - Kamex remix (Gtexchus) - Nicely done chart. Only thing that I really disagree with are the fakes around the middle section, which I prefer to have them more as mines instead.

She’s into the stupid game [dotone] - Originally rejected, but the chart after secondary resubmission is now difficulty consistent so this is good to pass. Only thing that didn’t make sense to me are the 24th bursts around the near ending of the chart, I recommend giving it a once over.

Shinkakei Sketch - Shigure Ui (Tortualex) - Another banger from Tortualex. I find the mines to be a little odd at times, like what are the purpose of them?

Todoroke! Koi no Beanball!! Funkot Remix (EtienneXD)

Conditional:
IM THE GOD OF BASS [savimybeloved] - Some changes are good and some changes were not good. We’re not quite there yet. I’ll look into giving you more detailed feedback on the chart at some point so that you get a good idea of what exactly you should change.

Rejected:
permanent [m1s] - While the approach makes sense, I unfortunately have to reject it because it VERY hard to play and gauge from a judge perspective. You have sections in the chart that I find to be very unreasonable to do, but I don’t have enough confidence to detail which ones exactly, because the chart as a whole feels very rng to execute during a playtest. One play I can hit this pattern, and on another play I can hit this other pattern but not the first one anymore. This can be resubmitted if you have a secondary difficulty that is much more manageable and reasonable to play.

To - Alice Lidell [val] - Already released in All of My Sets 2.

Set 13, 14 reviews:

Passed Charts:
Charismax [SigWIfeStarry]

Cycles [Ballistic] - This is a very nice chart and captures the song fairly well. The only thing that I kinda disagree with is abstracting the gabber kicks at the second half with those 24th streams. But, it doesn’t cause a hindrance to the file and it flows quite well, so it’s mostly just my personal opinion. I don’t think I’ve seen your charts before so it’s good to see more new faces charting something. This is why making this pack is important.

Vitrum (NzArs)

Conditional:
Liturgy of Ice (Rhythm Mix) - I don’t have enough time to write a review for this at the moment. But in short, I can see the potential in this file, but some sections are still quite off. I need some time to think about whether or not this is salvageable where you can make further edits to it or it’d require too much work to pass in its current state. I’m hoping the community can give more feedback on this one, so that’s why it’s placed in Conditional at the moment. Also this is a very nice song. Almost makes me wanna chart it myself. If you don’t mind it happening, I do consider making my own difficulty out of this song.

Set 15 reviews:

Passed Charts:

ACTION [Ballistic]

brace (Matthia) - Average Matthia file. It almost looks like it’s a dump but when you look at it more it’s actually not really. You got me fooled there. Next time please zip your folder and not the content inside the folder, as mentioned in the submission form.

Quantum Uncertainty (bluevie)

Conditional:
Simurgh (Agyll) - This is nice. However, the right 24th one hand trill near the ending is not nice and a spike. Change it to a two handed trill and this should be good to pass.

Edit: Simurgh is now moved to Passed after the trill fix.

Set 16 reviews:

Passed Charts:
Hidamari no Machi (TAMUSIC Violin cover) [Curiosity] - Technically makes sense, though I am a bit surprised by the dense approach to a chill song like this. I think this song would benefit a lot from an extra easier difficulty. So, I highly recommend you making another difficulty that’s more chill than what you have right now.

Citadel [Axel Sky] - Added as a secondary difficulty next to your original one.

Boundaries in the Sky [Samctuary]

Conditional:
Nintendo DS Soul Injection [pointy] - The overall approach makes sense but your layering consistency gets lost in the process, making it harder to understand what you’re trying to represent. Most notable example is around the second half where you use jumps to represent kicks but suddenly give up on doing that. You should give a double check to your layering and then this will be good to pass. Cut is more acceptable this time around, but I do wonder what would’ve happened if you charted the whole thing (assuming you did chart the whole thing before but decided to cut it?).

Also, there are a few more updates to the pack:

Submissions will close on May 1st. That includes submitting fixes to your charts. So if you have something to submit, now’s your time to do it!

Also, because of the demand, and after some discussion with a few participants in the Discord server, the pack will be split into two volumes (so essentially, EOKP1 and EOKP2). So don’t feel like you are too late to send something because of the sheer amount of submissions, you will still have a room in the pack.

Set 17, 18, 19 reviews:

Passed Charts:
looping the room (Ria) - I quite like this. The overall approach makes sense but I do notice some small inconsistencies here and there, so maybe you should give this a once-over. Also, try not to repeat copy-paste patterns very close to each other because it does feel kinda lazy / half-done (for example: 01:49.802-02:01.654 - instead of copying the first 4 measures again, try to diversify the patterns a bit more)

Nintendo DS Soul Injection [pointy]

Long Train Running [GreenDeLeBean]

Shinkakei Sketch - Shigure Ui (Tortualex)

TWILIGHT ZONE (R-C Extended Club MIX)

Rejected:
Acid God (Extended Mix) [Lidelle] - I’m honestly gonna have to take a pass on this one. While I think I understand your approach, there are many mistimed layerings + snaps throughout the chart (e.g. some jump/hand patterns don’t line up with the music and are either placed too early/late), and the ending is just too much of a mess that doesn’t make sense to me. More personally, I feel like the chart is a little too in-your-face with some of its dense approach. Could not be a problem if you have another difficulty that decreases that density. But combined with the issues specified, this chart needs a lot more work.

losin it [savimybeloved] - This is a dump chart. Not something that is suitable for this pack. I encourage you to read the submission rules again and submit something more appropriate.

Moonlight Sonata [BudEBoy]

permanent (m1s)

Set 20 reviews:

Passed Charts:
The Thrill (Porter Robinson Remix) [Zyxel]

Twilight Zone (R-C Extended Club Mix) [jesscrisis] - Haven’t seen if the file in ⁠wip-links is resubbed to the form.

Looping the rooms = ループザルーム [Ria] - This is good. I will send James notes/thoughts for revisions/tweaks recommended whenever i have the chance and don’t forget.

Bloom [Axel Sky]

FREEDOM DiVE↓ [James May] - Recommend to look at the feedback I posted in ⁠scores-feedback

Conditional:
Valed [ricetoast] - Okay so, what happened to the sync of this chart? This is the first submission in the pack where I noticed the offset is significantly off. I opened it in the editor and the chart was a whopping 30ms off (somewhere around that range, i don’t remember exact number since i fixed it while playtesting and i’m writing this the next day). Ignoring that, I understand that the chart’s tempo is floaty, and sync is not going to be 100% perfect, but I did notice a few places where some 4ths felt quite off, so I’d recommend giving this another look and shift bpms again wherever needed. Beyond that, the chart is great. It does feel a lot more abstracted than I expected, but it stays within the limits of this song. However, the ending is incredibly silly. I like the way it’s charted, but the density of it is very spiky and needs a nerf. So to summarize this giant wall of text. Fix offset, revise the ending to not be as spiky and try to balance it to the rest of the song’s difficulty, and i’d recommend giving another look at the sync and fix spots that may feel a little off while playing/looking at waveform in the editor.

Rejected:
Dominus Abyssi Phase I [Axel Sky] - I have yet to see this chart in full depth so it’s why I’m placing it in Conditional, but I do think we’re gonna have a problem with this one. I’ve looked at about half of the chart and I notice you’re kind of going over the place with what you’re deciding to represent. For example, you represent a segment with one set of sounds and then immediately shift your structure into a different set of sounds. I’ll try to comment on this one more later when I give this chart a full review.

Update: gonna have to move this to Rejected as I still find the chart pretty underwhelming and the structure is fairly inconsistent.

Set 21, 22 reviews:

Passed Charts:
Ghost - Umbra (Tortualex) - Focused only on hardest diff, I assume the easier one is fine as well

Nintendo DS Soul Injection [pointy]

TWILIGHT ZONE (R-C Extended Club MIX)

Valed (ricetoast) - Sync still feels a little off at a few places, but we’ll see what others think

Dummy! (bluevie)

Quantum Uncertainty (bluevie)

She’s into the stupid game [dotone] - though still fix those 24ths i mentioned

polygon (Zeta)

gladde paling - ochtendbloem [Snicks]

Conditional:
redloop (remory) - To recap in Martzi’s stream: The roll holds definitely need to go from the file, they don’t work and using rolls close to each other force you to score bad judgements if you aren’t careful. Other than that, the 24ths at the first drop slightly don’t make sense. I understand your intent with them, but because they’re connected together it’s very difficult to understand what you’re trying to represent there. I’d recommend isolating those 24ths into two distinct parts that would be easier to grasp them accordingly to the song https://b.catgirlsare.sexy/vcvkfTJvS76F.png

Rejected:
witch trials [Kori] - This is not a bad file in my opinion but it certainly doesn’t fit this pack due to it being half a dump. I suggest maybe submitting this to a pack like Cucktech instead?

Also, another pack update:

Over the next few days, I’ll start finalizing and locking in some songs for the first EOKP pack. You can check the spreadsheet to see what’s getting picked by looking for “EOKP 1” in the comments.

Don’t stress if some of your charts don’t make it into the first pack, since there’s gonna be a volume two as well. There’s only so many songs I can fit into one pack without it getting way too big, which is why both volumes are happening.

I do have a rough idea of how to diversify the song list between both packs so they’re each fun to play. But honestly, even if one pack ends up stronger than the other, it doesn’t really matter. At the end of the day, the main goal is to showcase fun charts made by the community, like it’s always been.

Set 23, 24 reviews:

Passed Charts:
Dominus Abyssi Phase I - Axel Sky (Tortualex) - First of all, props for charting the song and resubmitting it to the pack. While I’m passing it right now, I’ll have to admit that your layering/structure in this chart is kinda over the place. Sometimes you chart lots of sounds at once and sometimes you chart a few of them and ignore the rest. The layering is also not always consistent and you suddenly change the way your representing certain sounds (this is most noticable at the intro for both of my points). The chnage to 24ths at the breaks especially does not make sense to me. If you want to slow down the tempo, slow it down with 32nds. 24ths should be reserved for sections that do call for 24ths, and this break section is just all 16ths. Also, you should nerf that giant 48th roll wall at the second half, its spiky and its technically not 48ths.

fallen (Ticaronda) - This is a very funny chart. That huge 64th rollwall made me giggle a bit. Overall, the file makes sense to me so it’s good to pass. I have a feeling some people will be slightly annoyed with how it was charted, but as long as I get it, who cares?

The sun, the moon, the star (Durvin) - Very solid marathon chart. I like how incredibly ballsy you went with the one handed trills and the jack anchors which adds a lot more personality to the chart. Some anchors felt unintentionally long because of the mix of the 16th drums with the 8th kicks, but difficulty wise I don’t think it impacts that much. Honestly, probably the best file I’ve seen from you so far.

Pigstep (ricetoast)

Conditional:
Safe And Sound Frenchcore Remix (NanoJay21) - I have mixed feelings on this one. The overall approach make sense, but I do not like how often the sections are copy-pasted with little to no variation. I could tell that you used sections from your first drop and copied them more than once in snippets to the next drops. If they had more variation in their patterning (for example, simply mirroring the patterns at minimum) it would have not been as noticable to me. Also I don’t really agree with the 12th ‘slowdown’ streams so they should be adjusted as well. If you can take care of these two issues, then the chart can be passed.

Rejected:
Evil Gameboy (walitam) - Sadly this file didn’t make sense to me as much. The layering is not consistent and the approach with the bursts/32nd streams is really weird and arbitrary.

Aerostorm (ricetoast) - This is something i’d see in a pack like cucktech instead of here. It was really difficult for me to understand the patterning and also the chart gradually becomes not so technical/conventional anymore. It also has some really nasty spikes in it which makes it not fit for this pack.

Set 25 reviews:

This one kinda burned me out from writing stuff so expect not much elaboration on the charts.

Passed Charts:
Nour (Sakisagee)

Ghost - Umbra (Tortualex)

She’s into the stupid game [dotone]

Conditional:
Safe And Sound Frenchcore Remix (NanoJay21) - Good changes. I have a few more small issues to point out before this file gets passed so we’ll need to talk more directly.

Target Planet Has Been Destroyed (NanoJay21) - This is alright but there are a few sections (mainly at the second half) that I don’t really agree with them ignoring the music and focus on density/practice instead. I’ll also need to talk about this one more directly before this gets passed.

I don’t have Stoat set up at the moment. If you don’t have Discord and you’d like us to talk more directly, It’d be preferable that instead of Stoat you set up a Matrix account, or we could talk through forum messages. Whichever you’d prefer.

Rejected:
Beaker Sunset (Sklitterbeer) - I think I understand your overall approach to this chart but the first half does not make sense to me too much… lots of pattern/structure inconsistencies that I don’t really get. I think this needs a bit more work before this can be considered Passed.

Le Panorama Electr&Bic M[e_i]ssy Pandaiii (ricetoast) - Oh man I’ve been wanting to chart this song (the original SPCS v1, this one is v2.1). I like this chart but unfortunately I find this too dumpy to fit in this pack. That said, I want to feature this in another (secret) pack I’m working on that definitely fits the vibe more. So be on the lookout for when I reach out to you for this chart.

LOVELOVELOVELOVELOVELOVE (NanoJay21) - I’ll be honest that this song doesn’t do it for me and the chart itself seem to be purely practice oriented than it is faithfully adhering to the music. Outside of this pack it’s not much of a problem since the chart seems to be fairly consistent, but against all your other submissions I’d say this one is the least favourable one so far.